Wednesday, December 24, 2003
Why is it that I have received far more [spam] email about Paris Hilton than about anything else? Why does anyone care if she got 'banged'? Who actually wants to see this 'infamous' footage of her being a 'cum-guzzling whore'? Is the sexual realisation of someone normally known in a different context somehow more erotic (because pornography is always intensely erotic, of course < /irony>) than the objectification of someone who has no other context, i.e. the 'porn star'? Is this why readers' wives features and amateurism are so popular, because although we don't know these women we can imagine we do much better than with Jenna Jameson or whoever? And if this sexual recontextualisation is part of the appeal, then why still the fascination with Paris Hilton, because she seemingly has no other context and ergo may as well be a 'porn star'? And why the hell does she not appear to be upset at all about this explicit and voracious sexual objectification of herself?
I fear the continued popularity of Paris Hilton may simply be down to amny men's desire to "fuck some posh totty".
12/24/2003 09:04:00 am
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home